This evaluation examines the Caribbean Development Bank’s (CDB) Country Engagement Strategy (CES) for Saint Lucia for the period 2020–23, including activities designed and implemented until December 2024. The evaluation uses a mixed-methods approach, combining document reviews, portfolio analysis, and stakeholder interviews, to inform the next CES. The evaluation process supported participation, reflection, and co-creation. During the inception phase, feedback was collected from CDB staff and Government of Saint Lucia (GOSL) counterparts to refine the focus and ensure evaluation questions would generate insights aligned with both CDB’s strategic needs and GOSL priorities. A Theory of Change workshop was conducted with CDB and GOSL stakeholders to reconstruct the underlying logic of the CES and identify key assumptions and change pathways. This collaboration provided a shared foundation for assessing progress and strategic alignment. Validation of emerging findings was carried out via an online workshop. A hybrid co-creation workshop was held with Saint Lucia-based stakeholders and CDB staff to collaboratively develop recommendations and ensure proposed actions are useful, specific, and actionable, with the aim of increasing the success of the next CES.
Suriname Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation
Financial Services
Evaluation Report
Country (CESE/CSPE)
Complete
Suriname
Management Response
Yes
Summary
This evaluation is the first by the Office of Independent Evaluation of the Caribbean Development Bank’s (CDB) Country Strategy and Programme in Suriname. It covers the Country Strategy Paper (CSP) (2014-18) and more recent developments up to 2020, including the first months of the new government.Suriname is the newest borrowing member of CDB, having joined in 2013. At that time, it was seen as a country which had made significant development strides in a relatively short time frame, with an expectation of anchoring growth on a platform of deep structural reforms. Bank membership offered Suriname a means of furthering its economic integration in the Region, while for CDB, developing a new programme in Suriname offered a route to expanding its borrowing membership and diversifying its loan portfolio in what was then a relatively benign credit risk environment.This positive starting point was not sustained for long. Soon after the CSP was approved, the economic situation deteriorated sharply. In 2015-16, there was a sharp recession, and Suriname needed support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), as well as CDB and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). The government at the time had limited success in delivering on key reforms such as reducing fuel subsidies. The new government which came in during 2020 is now seeking to address economic challenges exacerbated by COVID-19, again requiring IMF support.