This evaluation examines the Caribbean Development Bank’s (CDB) Country Engagement Strategy (CES) for Saint Lucia for the period 2020–23, including activities designed and implemented until December 2024. The evaluation uses a mixed-methods approach, combining document reviews, portfolio analysis, and stakeholder interviews, to inform the next CES. The evaluation process supported participation, reflection, and co-creation. During the inception phase, feedback was collected from CDB staff and Government of Saint Lucia (GOSL) counterparts to refine the focus and ensure evaluation questions would generate insights aligned with both CDB’s strategic needs and GOSL priorities. A Theory of Change workshop was conducted with CDB and GOSL stakeholders to reconstruct the underlying logic of the CES and identify key assumptions and change pathways. This collaboration provided a shared foundation for assessing progress and strategic alignment. Validation of emerging findings was carried out via an online workshop. A hybrid co-creation workshop was held with Saint Lucia-based stakeholders and CDB staff to collaboratively develop recommendations and ensure proposed actions are useful, specific, and actionable, with the aim of increasing the success of the next CES.
Multicycle Evaluation of the Unified Special Development Fund Eighth and Ninth Cycles 2013-2020
Financial Services
Evaluation Report
Corporate
Complete
CDB
Management Response
Yes
Summary
This report presents the findings, conclusions, and recommendations from the Multicycle Evaluation of the Unified Special Development Fund (SDF), specifically focusing on the Eighth and Ninth Cycles (SDF 8 and SDF 9). It was commissioned by the Caribbean Development Bank’s (CDB) Office of Independent Evaluation (OIE) and conducted by Technopolis Group. The evaluation aimed to identify achievements, challenges, and recommendations to improve future SDF cycles, particularly SDF 11, the replenishment phase of which is scheduled to begin in March 2024. To this end, the evaluation addresses five key criteria: Relevance, Coherence, Efficiency, Effectiveness, and sustainability, following OECD DAC guidelines.SDF 8 (2013–2016) aimed to address development challenges, focusing on inclusive and sustainable growth, environmental sustainability and climate change, citizen security, and regional cooperation and integration (RCI). The overall programme level was USD$348 million.SDF 9 (2017–2020) aligned with new international development frameworks, emphasising support for Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) targets, climate resilience, and regional cooperation. Major cross-cutting areas included good governance, environmental sustainability, and gender equality. The programme level for SDF 9 was USD355 million.Key differences between SDF 8 and 9 include the full incorporation of SDGs into SDF 9’s poverty-reduction principles, structural reforms in the Basic Needs Trust Fund (BNTF), and initiatives such as the opening of the Haiti Country Office and the regional focal point for RCI initiatives.